I came across this while reading some of my high school age kid's 'Writing Requirements' and it really struck a nerve. Perhaps not every post needs to end with a 'clincher statement' but I believe that if a 15YO boy is being told 'These are the requirements for writing' that we are not being unreasonable in expecting our community of professionals to adhere to, at the very least, the first 3 bullet points.
Even the fourth one 'Uses details and examples from the work' would definitely be advisable.
We'll disregard the 'Evidence = full credit' because unless we implemented a solution where badly written questions ('Do my job') can result in a reduction of points, I'd hate to see what the community point gamers can come up with - to ask well-formed questions that are still ridiculous just in order to gain points.
What do you all think? I think there should be criteria that questions must meet. Just saying 'I'm new to SAP, how can I make Workflow send a notification to Person A' is not good enough.
Expecting I'm opening a can of worms, but hey, I can take it.
Cheers,
Sue